Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

StatkraftStatkraft
VS
IberdrolaIberdrola
Statkraft

Statkraft

Lilleakerveien 6, Oslo, Oslo, 0283, NO

Last Update: 14/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.statkraft.com
778/1000Fair

Statkraft is a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, solar power, gas-fired power and supplies district heating. Statkraft is a global company in energy market operati...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:4,838
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

Plaza Euskadi, 5, Bilbao, 48009, ES

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.iberdrola.com
823/1000Good

With more than 180 years of history, Iberdrola is today a global energy leader, the leading wind power producer and one of the largest electricity companies in the world in terms of stock market capitalisation. We have been committed to clean energy for more than 20 ye...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:27,070
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Statkraft

Statkraft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Statkraft in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

Iberdrola has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Statkraft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Statkraft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Iberdrola (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iberdrola cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Statkraft

Statkraft

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BE-IBEALSARC1776666624

FAQ

Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Statkraft company and Iberdrola company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Statkraft and Iberdrola, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Statkraft and Iberdrola, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Statkraft or Iberdrola ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Statkraft or Iberdrola ?
Between Statkraft and Iberdrola, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Statkraft and Iberdrola, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9