Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Department of StateU.S. Department of State
VS
World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization
U.S. Department of State

U.S. Department of State

2201 C St., NW, Washington, DC, US, 20520

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.state.gov
810/1000Good

The U.S. Department of State is focused on accomplishing America's mission of diplomacy at home and around the world. The U.S. Department of State manages America’s relationships with foreign governments, international organizations, and the people of other countries. T...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:37,659
Subsidiaries:93
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

20, avenue Appia, Geneva 27, 1211, CH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.who.int
808/1000Good

The World Health Organization's mission: to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of healt...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:30,956
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Department of State

U.S. Department of State

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of State in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Health Organization in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Department of State (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of State cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - World Health Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Health Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Department of State

U.S. Department of State

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DOS704071524
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WOR201411222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WOR903061925

FAQ

Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Department of State company and World Health Organization company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Department of State and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Department of State or World Health Organization ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Department of State or World Health Organization ?
Between U.S. Department of State and World Health Organization, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Department of State and World Health Organization, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9