Comparison Overview
State Street Investment Management

State Street Investment Management
1 Iron Street, Boston, MA, US, 02210
Last Update: 24/02/2026
About State Street Investment Management At State Street Investment Management, we have been delivering better outcomes to institutions, financial intermediaries, and investors for nearly half a century. Starting with our early innovations in indexing and ETFs, our rigo...

Sicredi
Av. Assis Brasil, Porto Alegre, 91010-003, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are born collaborative We believe that change is only possible when everyone works together for the same purpose, after all, cooperativism is in our DNA. Besides this, we know that as important as it is to provide affordable financial solutions it is just as importa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

State Street Investment Management







Sicredi






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for State Street Investment Management in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sicredi in 2026.
Incident History - State Street Investment Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
State Street Investment Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sicredi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sicredi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

State Street Investment Management

Sicredi
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.