Comparison Overview
State of Oklahoma

State of Oklahoma
2300 N Lincoln Blvd, Oklahoma City, 73105, US
Last Update: 10/04/2026
The State of Oklahoma provides services to Oklahomans via roughly 30,000 state employees working across dozens of state agencies.

State of Ohio
US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Employment with the State of Ohio is more than ‘just a job’ – it is a privilege to serve our families, friends and neighbors who rely on us throughout our great state. We are a team of dedicated public servants committed to high performance, innovative thinking, and del...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

State of Oklahoma







State of Ohio






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
State of Oklahoma has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for State of Ohio in 2026.
Incident History - State of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)
State of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - State of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)
State of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

State of Oklahoma

State of Ohio
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.