Comparison Overview

State of Ohio

VS

UK Home Office

State of Ohio

US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ohio.gov

Employment with the State of Ohio is more than ‘just a job’ – it is a privilege to serve our families, friends and neighbors who rely on us throughout our great state. We are a team of dedicated public servants committed to high performance, innovative thinking, and delivering excellent and efficient services. Our goal is to recruit and retain the best talent for our positions, because when we have the best talent, we get the best results for our community. We are #TeamOhio.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 27,825
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UK Home Office

2 Marsham Street, None, London, None, GB, SW1P 4DF
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office

At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - keeping the United Kingdom safe from the threat of terrorism - reducing and preventing crime, and ensuring people feel safe in their homes and communities - securing the UK border and controlling immigration - considering applications to enter and stay in the UK - issuing passports and visas - supporting visible, responsible and accountable policing by empowering the public and freeing up the police to fight crime - fire prevention and rescue These organisations are all part of the Home Office: - Border Force - HM Passport Office (HMPO) - Immigration Enforcement - UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI)

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,852
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-ohio.jpeg
State of Ohio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-home-office.jpeg
UK Home Office
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Ohio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UK Home Office
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Ohio in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2025.

Incident History — State of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UK Home Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Home Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-ohio.jpeg
State of Ohio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-home-office.jpeg
UK Home Office
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Insecure Data Handling, Improper Access Controls, Accidental Publication
Motivation: Negligence, Operational Failures, Potential Espionage (for Afghan/PSNI breaches), Financial Gain (for dark web sales of leaked data)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UK Home Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State of Ohio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UK Home Office company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State of Ohio company has not reported any.

In the current year, UK Home Office company and State of Ohio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UK Home Office company nor State of Ohio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UK Home Office company has disclosed at least one data breach, while State of Ohio company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UK Home Office company nor State of Ohio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State of Ohio company nor UK Home Office company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither State of Ohio company nor UK Home Office company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

State of Ohio company employs more people globally than UK Home Office company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor UK Home Office holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References