Comparison Overview

State of Minnesota

VS

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

State of Minnesota

75 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US, 55155
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Minnesota State Government is the third largest employer in the state of Minnesota, employing over 50,000 diverse and talented employees in more than 100 state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities. Our workplaces can be found across the state in 86 out of 87 Minnesota counties and a small share of employees work in out-of-state locations. When you bring your career to the State of Minnesota, the work you do affects the quality of life of millions of Minnesotans. From those who shape policy, to those who keep us safe, preserve our environment, or take care of our most vulnerable populations, we take our responsibilities to the public seriously. Join us as we continue to serve our great state and build a better Minnesota. To learn more about our career opportunities and comprehensive benefits, visit www.mn.gov/careers. To learn more about our state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities, visit http://mn.gov/portal/government/state/agencies-boards-commissions.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 58,237
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

875, Grande-Allée Est, Québec, G1R 5R8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Travailler dans la fonction publique du Québec, c'est plus qu'une carrière! Réparti(e)s dans une vingtaine de ministères et une soixantaine d'organismes à travers le Québec, tous les gestes posés par les employé(e)s de la fonction publique façonnent l’avenir de la société et contribuent à améliorer la vie des Québécoises et Québécois; nous rendons nos routes sécuritaires; nous protégeons nos richesses naturelles; nous faisons rayonner notre culture; nous améliorons nos milieux de vie; etc. Pour nous, être au service de la population, c’est bien plus qu’une carrière! Travailler dans la fonction publique québécoise permet d’œuvrer dans différentes organisations tout en maintenant ses conditions de travail. Nous adhérons aux valeurs de compétence, d’impartialité, d’intégrité, de loyauté et de respect; nous offrons de bonnes conditions de travail, de même que des milieux de travail sains et motivants, nous valorisons l’équité, la diversité et l’inclusion par notre Programme d’accès à l’égalité en emploi dont l’objectif principal est d’assurer une meilleure représentativité des groupes victimes de discrimination en emploi, nous favorisons l’équilibre entre la vie professionnelle et personnelle, nous misons sur le développement des compétences, nous sommes fier(ères) et dévoué(e)s. Nous sommes la fonction publique du Québec!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 36,414
Subsidiaries: 45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gouvernement-du-quebec.jpeg
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Minnesota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Minnesota in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières in 2026.

Incident History — State of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gouvernement-du-quebec.jpeg
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both State of Minnesota company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to State of Minnesota company.

In the current year, Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company and State of Minnesota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company nor State of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company nor State of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company nor State of Minnesota company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota company nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Minnesota company.

State of Minnesota company employs more people globally than Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H