Comparison Overview

State of Indiana

VS

Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki

State of Indiana

200 W. Washington St., Indianapolis, 46204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

State government is more than senators, representatives, and elected officials. We build highways, provide drivers licenses, protect our children and vulnerable populations, create jobs, connect Hoosiers to job opportunities, maintain state parks, train law enforcement officers, and we run museums and hospitals. We also provide unemployment insurance, disability, and workers compensation, among countless other services. We're 30,000 strong and still have more work to do. Find out where you fit with us at WorkForIndiana.IN.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,308
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki

Pohjoisesplanadi 11-13, Helsinki, 00170, FI
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

#MeTeemmeHelsingin Helsingin kaupunki on Suomen suurin työnantaja, jonka palveluksessa on lähes 39 000 ammattilaista ja asiantuntijaa. Helsingin kaupunki tarjoaa henkilöstölle monipuolisia, mielenkiintoisia ja yhteiskunnallisesti merkittäviä työtehtäviä, hyvät mahdollisuudet kehittymiseen, ammattitaitoiset työkaverit, työaikajoustot sekä kilpailukykyiset henkilöstöedut. Lisää kaupungista työnantajana: https://www.hel.fi/fi/avoimet-tyopaikat/miksi-toihin-kaupungille Helsingin kaupungin kotisivut: www.hel.fi *** Helsingfors stad, Finlands största arbetsgivare, har cirka 39 000 anställda. Dessa yrkesmänniskor och experter, som företräder ett antal olika branscher. Tack vare stadens och sektorernas storlek har de anställda mångsidiga, intressanta och samhälleligt viktiga arbetsuppgifter, goda möjligheter att utbilda sig och utvecklas, yrkeskunniga arbetskamrater, arbetstidsflexibilitet och konkurrenskraftiga personalförmåner. Mer om staden som arbetsgivare: https://www.hel.fi/sv/lediga-jobb/varfor-borja-arbeta-hos-staden Helsinki stad webbplats: www.hel.fi/sv *** The City of Helsinki is Finland’s biggest employer with 39 000 employees, who are professionals and experts of various fields. The large size of the City and the wide scope of the fields of employment give the City personnel versatile and socially important jobs, good opportunities for training and development on the job, skilled colleagues, flexible working hours and competitive personnel benefits. City as an employer: https://www.hel.fi/en/open-jobs/why-work-for-the-city City of Helsinki website: www.hel.fi/en

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,109
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-indiana.jpeg
State of Indiana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-helsinki.jpeg
Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Indiana
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Indiana in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki in 2026.

Incident History — State of Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-indiana.jpeg
State of Indiana
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-helsinki.jpeg
Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: VPN remote access server exploitation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Indiana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of Indiana and Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company and State of Indiana company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company nor State of Indiana company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company and State of Indiana company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company nor State of Indiana company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State of Indiana company nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Indiana company.

State of Indiana company employs more people globally than Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Indiana nor Helsingin kaupunki – Helsingfors stad – City of Helsinki holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H