Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Starbucks EMEAStarbucks EMEA
VS
NextNext
Starbucks EMEA

Starbucks EMEA

Building 7 Chiswick Business Park, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, GB, W45YG

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.starbuckstories.com/emea
769/1000Fair

By bringing people together over coffee, Starbucks has become one of the world’s best-known and best loved companies. Working at Starbucks is a lot like working with your friends! When you work here, you’re not an “employee” – we call ourselves “partners” because we bel...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Next

Next

Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire, GB, LE19 4AT

Last Update: 30/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://careers.next.co.uk/
813/1000Good

At Next we never underestimate what we can do. Bring your energy, play to your strengths and never shy away from change. Push yourself and back others. Make things happen that will be bigger and better than before. Come and work for one of the UK’s biggest retailers. ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:25,463
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Starbucks EMEA

Starbucks EMEA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Next

Next

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starbucks EMEA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Starbucks EMEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starbucks EMEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Next (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Starbucks EMEA

Starbucks EMEA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Next

Next

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Starbucks EMEA company and Next company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Starbucks EMEA and Next, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Starbucks EMEA and Next, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Starbucks EMEA or Next ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Starbucks EMEA or Next ?
Between Starbucks EMEA and Next, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Starbucks EMEA and Next, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES