Comparison Overview
Starbucks Australia

Starbucks Australia
Collingwood, Melbourne, AU
Last Update: 04/04/2026
With our partners, our coffee and our customers at our core, we live these values: Craft We deliver excellence with passion and creativity. Courage We do the right thing, even when it’s hard. Results We exceed expectations of the people we serve. Belonging We t...

Frito-Lay
7701 Legacy Dr, Plano, 75024, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
We believe every consumer should have access to their favorite snack, everywhere. We own the manufacturing process from seed to shelf and actively invest in technology to automate key steps of the process. This helps us be more agile in what we need to make, who we need...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Starbucks Australia







Frito-Lay






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Starbucks Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Frito-Lay in 2026.
Incident History - Starbucks Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Starbucks Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Frito-Lay (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Frito-Lay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Starbucks Australia

Frito-Lay
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.