Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Stanford Department of MedicineStanford Department of Medicine
VS
University of South CarolinaUniversity of South Carolina
Stanford Department of Medicine

Stanford Department of Medicine

Palo Alto, 94305, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

The Department of Medicine is committed to setting the highest standards for patient care, ground-breaking biomedical research, professional education, teaching, and training. We are devoted to advancing the science of medicine by developing new methods to prevent, dia...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:107
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

Columbia, SC, US, 29208

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sc.edu
799/1000Fair

With thriving academic and research excellence and a lively, welcoming student experience, the University of South Carolina brings the opportunities of higher education to new generations. South Carolina's unrivaled college experience has been sought by students, facul...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,232
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Stanford Department of Medicine

Stanford Department of Medicine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Department of Medicine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Stanford Department of Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Department of Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Stanford Department of Medicine

Stanford Department of Medicine

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA630080525
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine and University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine and University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Stanford Department of Medicine or University of South Carolina ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Stanford Department of Medicine or University of South Carolina ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine and University of South Carolina, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Stanford Department of Medicine and University of South Carolina, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA