Comparison Overview

Standard Chartered

VS

CIC

Standard Chartered

1 Basinghall Avenue, London, EC2V 5DD, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.sc.com

We are a leading international banking group, with a presence in 54 of the world’s most dynamic markets. Our purpose is to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity, and our heritage and values are expressed in our brand promise, here for good. If you’re interested joining Standard Chartered sign up to our Talent Network. Link: https://www.sc.com/careers/talentnetwork Standard Chartered PLC is listed on the London and Hong Kong stock exchanges.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 78,279
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

CIC

6, Avenue de Provence, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75009
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cic.fr

CIC is the fourth largest banking group in France, consisting of seven regional banks which operate across France through a network of 1,844 branches employing 24,000 staff. CIC's customer base includes 2.7 million retail clients. One in eleven self-employed professionals is a CIC group client and nearly one in three companies banks with CIC Group.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,058
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standardchartered.jpeg
Standard Chartered
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cic.jpeg
CIC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Standard Chartered
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CIC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standard Chartered in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIC in 2026.

Incident History — Standard Chartered (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standard Chartered cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standardchartered.jpeg
Standard Chartered
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised ATM Network
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cic.jpeg
CIC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Standard Chartered company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Standard Chartered company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CIC company has not reported any.

In the current year, CIC company and Standard Chartered company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CIC company nor Standard Chartered company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Standard Chartered company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other CIC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CIC company nor Standard Chartered company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Standard Chartered company nor CIC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Standard Chartered company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CIC company.

Standard Chartered company employs more people globally than CIC company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Standard Chartered nor CIC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References