Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)
VS
Turner Construction CompanyTurner Construction Company
Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Dillenburgstraat 25a, Eindhoven, undefined, 5652 AM, NL

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stamendekoning.nl
751/1000Fair

Stam + De Koning, een ontwikkelende bouwer, opereert vanuit het Eindhovense hart in de Brabantse regio. Wij ontwikkelen en realiseren sinds 1987 uiteenlopende projecten op het gebied van wonen, werken, winkelen en recreëren. Dat doen we voor gemeenten, corporaties en an...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:131
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

375 Hudson Street, New York, 10014, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Turner is a North America-based, international construction services company and is a leading builder in diverse and numerous market segments. The company has earned recognition for undertaking large, complex projects, fostering innovation, embracing emerging technologi...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:18,335
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turner Construction Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Turner Construction Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Construction Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUR147072625

FAQ

Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) or Turner Construction Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) or Turner Construction Company ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA