Comparison Overview
Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)
Dillenburgstraat 25a, Eindhoven, undefined, 5652 AM, NL
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Stam + De Koning, een ontwikkelende bouwer, opereert vanuit het Eindhovense hart in de Brabantse regio. Wij ontwikkelen en realiseren sinds 1987 uiteenlopende projecten op het gebied van wonen, werken, winkelen en recreëren. Dat doen we voor gemeenten, corporaties en an...

ALEC Holdings
Marina Walk, 3601 - Marina Plaza, Dubai Marina, Dubai, U.A.E., Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 27639
Last Update: 04/04/2026
ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)







ALEC Holdings






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2026.
Incident History - Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Stam + De Koning Bouw (werkmaatschappij VolkerWessels)

ALEC Holdings
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.