Comparison Overview
Stages

Stages
19a Wetterkreuz, Erlangen, Bavaria, DE, 91058
Last Update: 21/03/2026
With “Stages” Method Park by UL has developed a process management tool that facilitates definition, implementation and monitoring of development and business processes. Stages ensure compliance with predefined quality standards and process models can be integrated into...

Sweco
Gjörwellsgatan 22, Stockholm, 112 60, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Sweco is at the heart of the green transition - planning and designing the sustainable communities and cities of the future. Together with our clients and the collective knowledge of our 23,000 architects, engineers and other specialists, we co-create solutions to addre...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Stages







Sweco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stages in 2026.
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sweco in 2026.
Incident History - Stages (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stages cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sweco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sweco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Stages

Sweco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.