Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Stadtsparkasse CuxhavenStadtsparkasse Cuxhaven
VS
Industrial and Commercial Bank of ChinaIndustrial and Commercial Bank of China
Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

Rohdestraße 6, Cuxhaven, Cuxhaven, DE, 27472

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ssk-cuxhaven.de
754/1000Fair

Wir, die Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven sind nicht nur für unsere Kund:innen, sondern auch für unsere 200 Mitarbeitenden ein wertvoller und zuverlässiger Partner. Unser Engagement in der Region und die Nähe zu den Menschen in dieser zeichnet uns aus. Mit einer Bilanzsumme von ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

No.55 FuXingMenNei Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.C, Beijing, 100140, CN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icbc.com.cn
780/1000Fair

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. (ICBC) (simplified Chinese: 中国工商银行; traditional Chinese: 中國工商銀行; pinyin: Zhōngguó Gōngshāng Yínháng, more commonly just 工行 Gōngháng) is China's largest bank and the largest bank in the world. It is one of China's "Big Four" s...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:19,999
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven company and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven or Industrial and Commercial Bank of China ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven or Industrial and Commercial Bank of China ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Stadtsparkasse Cuxhaven and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA