Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

St Vincent's Private Hospital MelbourneSt Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne
VS
PhilipsPhilips
St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

59 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, 3188, AU

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.svph.org.au/
764/1000Fair

Welcome to St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne! St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne (SVPHM) is a not-for-profit, private Catholic hospital caring for the community for more than 80 years. With 500+ registered beds and more than 1,800 staff across four hospita...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:534
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Philips

Philips

Amstelplein 2, Amsterdam, 1096 BC, NL

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
701/1000Moderate

Over the past decade we have transformed into a focused leader in health technology. At Philips, our purpose is to improve people’s health and well-being through meaningful innovation. We aim to improve 2.5 billion lives per year by 2030, including 400 million in under...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:71,631
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Philips

Philips

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Philips has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Philips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Philips

Philips

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1771093701
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PHI258072525

FAQ

Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne company and Philips company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne and Philips, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne and Philips, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne or Philips ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne or Philips ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne and Philips, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between St Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne and Philips, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA