Comparison Overview

ST TAMMANY PARISH

VS

HM Revenue & Customs

ST TAMMANY PARISH

1505 N Florida St Covington, LA 70433, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

None

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HM Revenue & Customs

Last Update: 2024-08-13 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is the UKโ€™s tax, payments and customs authority. We collect the money that pays for the UKโ€™s public services and help families and individuals with targeted financial support. We help the honest majority to get their taxes and payments right, and make it hard for the dishonest minority to cheat the system. We use LinkedIn to post regular updates about HMRCโ€™s work on subjects that will be of interest to the LinkedIn community, for instance business tax and advice on running your company, news on tax policy, and HMRC recruitment opportunities. This page is monitored by HMRC's Social Media Team, but at present we are unable to respond to comments. Connecting with HM Revenue and Customs GOV.UK: www.gov.uk/HMRC Twitter @HMRCgovuk - news, updates and guidance from HMRC @HMRCcareers - news, updates and job alerts from HMRCโ€™s Talent Acquisition team @HMRCPressOffice - our press office account providing multi-media press releases Facebook www.facebook.com/HMRC Blogs Life at HMRC blog - https://lifeathmrc.blog.gov.uk/ Working with tax agents - https://taxagents.blog.gov.uk Customer service Our customer service team is able to answer general queries at @HMRCCustomers or on our Facebook page www.facebook.com/HMRC. https://linktr.ee/HMRCgovuk

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 22,947
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
17
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-tammany-parish.jpeg
ST TAMMANY PARISH
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hmrc.jpeg
HM Revenue & Customs
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ST TAMMANY PARISH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HM Revenue & Customs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ST TAMMANY PARISH in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

HM Revenue & Customs has 44.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” ST TAMMANY PARISH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ST TAMMANY PARISH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” HM Revenue & Customs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HM Revenue & Customs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-tammany-parish.jpeg
ST TAMMANY PARISH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hmrc.jpeg
HM Revenue & Customs
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Insecure Data Handling, Improper Access Controls, Accidental Publication
Motivation: Negligence, Operational Failures, Potential Espionage (for Afghan/PSNI breaches), Financial Gain (for dark web sales of leaked data)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: human error (accidental data sharing via spreadsheet)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Students), Exploitation of Weak Security Practices, Use of Downloaded Hacking Tools, Misuse of Staff Credentials
Motivation: Dares, Notoriety, Financial Gain, Revenge, Rivalries, Testing Skills/Knowledge
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ST TAMMANY PARISH company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to HM Revenue & Customs company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

HM Revenue & Customs company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ST TAMMANY PARISH company has not reported any.

In the current year, HM Revenue & Customs company has reported more cyber incidents than ST TAMMANY PARISH company.

Neither HM Revenue & Customs company nor ST TAMMANY PARISH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

HM Revenue & Customs company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ST TAMMANY PARISH company has not reported such incidents publicly.

HM Revenue & Customs company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while ST TAMMANY PARISH company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ST TAMMANY PARISH company nor HM Revenue & Customs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

HM Revenue & Customs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ST TAMMANY PARISH company.

HM Revenue & Customs company employs more people globally than ST TAMMANY PARISH company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X