Comparison Overview

St. Lawrence Health

VS

UPMC

St. Lawrence Health

50 Leroy Street, Potsdam, New York, US, 13676
Last Update: 2025-12-09

St. Lawrence Health (SLH) was established in December 2013 with the mission to improve health and to expand access through coordination and integration of services. Canton-Potsdam Hospital, Potsdam; Gouverneur Hospital, Gouverneur; and Massena Hospital, Massena, operate under the umbrella of St. Lawrence Health. SLH became an affiliate of Rochester Regional Health (RRH) in January 2021. RRH is an internationally recognized integrated health services organization, and its industry distinctions include year-after-year Healthgrades awards, America’s 50 Best Hospitals™, multiple Magnet® Awards for nursing excellence, and the greatest number of Beacon Awards for Excellence of any hospital system in the nation. Canton-Potsdam Hospital (CPH) is a not-for-profit community hospital certified for 94 beds. Its core programs in emergency medicine, acute care, hospitalist medicine, critical care, and a Level III Trauma Center are supplemented by outpatient health services in Brasher Falls, Canton, Colton, Massena, Norfolk, Norwood, and Potsdam, NY. CPH offers specialty care in over 35 different specialties, including a robust orthopedic surgery and sports medicine program, and the Center for Cancer Care. Gouverneur Hospital, located in its namesake city in Northern New York, is a not-for-profit critical access hospital founded in 2013 and certified for 25 beds. Services include inpatient detox, substance use disorder rehabilitation, behavioral health services, emergency care, imaging and EKGs, physical rehabilitation, and respiratory therapy. Massena Hospital is a 25-bed community hospital providing inpatient, medical, and surgical services in addition to emergency care. MH’s main campus also provides imaging and laboratory services, nutritional counseling, respiratory care, and inpatient physical and speech therapies. cardiology, infusion, nephrology, neurology, OB-GYN and women’s health, pediatrics, and primary care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 286
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

UPMC

US Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15219
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 39,966
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-lawrence-health.jpeg
St. Lawrence Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Lawrence Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UPMC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Lawrence Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPMC in 2025.

Incident History — St. Lawrence Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Lawrence Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-lawrence-health.jpeg
St. Lawrence Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UPMC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Lawrence Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Lawrence Health and UPMC have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, UPMC company and St. Lawrence Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

St. Lawrence Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while UPMC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UPMC company nor St. Lawrence Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UPMC company nor St. Lawrence Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Lawrence Health company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UPMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Lawrence Health company.

UPMC company employs more people globally than St. Lawrence Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Lawrence Health nor UPMC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N