Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ST EngineeringST Engineering
VS
SaipemSaipem
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

ST Engineering Hub, Singapore, 567710, SG

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stengg.com
797/1000Fair

At ST Engineering, we apply our technology and innovation to solve real-world problems and improve lives. Our commitment to excellence and our track record as a global technology, defence, and engineering company earns us a reputation for quality and trust. Subsc...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:18,509
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Saipem

Saipem

Via Luigi Russolo, 5, Milan, 20138, IT

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.saipem.com
776/1000Fair

Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, S...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:26,852
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Saipem

Saipem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ST Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saipem in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ST Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ST Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Saipem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saipem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Saipem

Saipem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ST Engineering company and Saipem company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ST Engineering and Saipem, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ST Engineering and Saipem, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ST Engineering or Saipem ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ST Engineering or Saipem ?
Between ST Engineering and Saipem, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ST Engineering and Saipem, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3