Comparison Overview

St. Joseph Health

VS

Region Hovedstaden

St. Joseph Health

3345 Michelson Dr. Suite 100, Irvine, CA, US, 92612
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

St. Joseph Health is now Providence. We are look forward to staying connected with you via our main Providence page at https://www.linkedin.com/company/providencehealthsystem/ For additional content focused on workplace culture, our caregivers and hiring, please follow Providence Careers at https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/providencehealthsystemcareers/

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 2,730
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Region Hovedstaden

Kongens Vaenge 2, Hillerod, Capital Region, 3400, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Det handler om liv. Om at bringe liv til verden og skabe livskvalitet. Om at redde liv og forbedre liv. Som medarbejder i Region Hovedstaden træder du ind i en verden af muligheder og mangfoldighed med plads til dine ambitioner. Du er en del af et stærkt fagligt miljø, hvor vi har fingeren på pulsen og gør hinanden bedre. Det er noget af det, vi gerne vil vise dig på Region Hovedstadens LinkedIn-profil. Gå ind på www.regionh.dk/job og læs mere om jobmulighederne.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,587
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--joseph-health-system.jpeg
St. Joseph Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regionhovedstaden.jpeg
Region Hovedstaden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Joseph Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Region Hovedstaden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Joseph Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Hovedstaden in 2025.

Incident History — St. Joseph Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Joseph Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Region Hovedstaden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Hovedstaden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--joseph-health-system.jpeg
St. Joseph Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen Thumb Drive
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regionhovedstaden.jpeg
Region Hovedstaden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Region Hovedstaden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Joseph Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Joseph Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Region Hovedstaden company has not reported any.

In the current year, Region Hovedstaden company and St. Joseph Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Region Hovedstaden company nor St. Joseph Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

St. Joseph Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Region Hovedstaden company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Region Hovedstaden company nor St. Joseph Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Joseph Health company nor Region Hovedstaden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Region Hovedstaden company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Joseph Health company.

Region Hovedstaden company employs more people globally than St. Joseph Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Joseph Health nor Region Hovedstaden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H