Comparison Overview

SQUARE

VS

Ogilvy

SQUARE

Nedre gate 5, OSLO, N-0551, NO
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

SQUARE™ is offering custom and standard products for promotion and merchandising. Our full-service solutions range from creative concepts and design, to production and logistics. Based on your idea or specific needs, we deliver unique products that stand out.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Ogilvy

175 Greenwich St, New York, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, public relations, relationship design, consulting, and health capabilities with experts collaborating seamlessly across over 120 offices in nearly 90 countries. We are proud to currently rank as the #1 global agency network for creative excellence and effectiveness by WARC, signifying our ability to deliver creative solutions that drive unreasonable impact for clients and communities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11,995
Subsidiaries: 53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/square.jpeg
SQUARE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SQUARE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ogilvy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SQUARE in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ogilvy in 2025.

Incident History — SQUARE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SQUARE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ogilvy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ogilvy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/square.jpeg
SQUARE
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SQUARE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ogilvy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SQUARE company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ogilvy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ogilvy company and SQUARE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ogilvy company nor SQUARE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ogilvy company nor SQUARE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

SQUARE company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ogilvy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SQUARE company nor Ogilvy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ogilvy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SQUARE company.

Ogilvy company employs more people globally than SQUARE company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SQUARE nor Ogilvy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N