Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SQMSQM
VS
ValeVale
SQM

SQM

Los Militares 4290, Piso 6, Las Condes, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.sqm.com
797/1000Fair

SQM es una compañía chilena con 57 años de historia y una sólida posición económica y financiera. Con más de 9 mil trabajadores (internos y externos) y oficinas comerciales en todo el mundo, exporta sus productos a más de 110 países, y es una de las empresas chilenas de...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:4,647
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vale

Vale

Praia de Botafogo, 186, Salas 501 a 1901 , Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BR, 22250-145

Last Update: 05/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vale.com
818/1000Good

We are a global mining company producing iron ore, pellets, and nickel, and we are committed to becoming one of the safest, most trustworthy mining company in the world. With a workforce of 120,000 employees, we work every day to transform natural resources into prosper...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:68,959
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SQM

SQM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vale

Vale

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SQM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vale in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SQM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SQM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SQM

SQM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vale

Vale

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SQM company and Vale company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SQM and Vale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SQM and Vale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SQM or Vale ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SQM or Vale ?
Between SQM and Vale, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SQM and Vale, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES