Comparison Overview
Sprint Reply BE

Sprint Reply BE
Rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 5, Bruxelles, 1000, BE
Last Update: 20/12/2025
We are Sprint Reply BE, part of the Reply Network. Our mission is to transform the work environment by optimizing business processes with an automation mindset and an employee-driven approach. This contributes to our vision to empower employees to focus on the essence ...

Diebold Nixdorf
350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sprint Reply BE







Diebold Nixdorf






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sprint Reply BE in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.
Incident History - Sprint Reply BE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sprint Reply BE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sprint Reply BE

Diebold Nixdorf
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.