Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SPRINTERSPRINTER
VS
New BalanceNew Balance
SPRINTER

SPRINTER

N/A

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
731/1000Moderate

Sprinter es el lugar de encuentro de la gente que vive deportivamente. Para quienes sacan tiempo de donde no hay para ir al gym o salir a correr. Y para todos aquell@s que eligen la comodidad a la hora de vestir, sin sacrificar el estilo. En sus más de 210 tiendas físi...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:3,217
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
New Balance

New Balance

100 Guest St, Brighton Landing, Brighton, MA, US, 02135-2088

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newbalance.com
795/1000Fair

In 1906, New Balance began as a humble one-man operation founded on the belief that “we were born to move,” and has since grown into an international corporation, selling footwear and apparel in over 120 countries and employing over 14,000 associates worldwide. Our miss...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:10,912
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SPRINTER

SPRINTER

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
New Balance

New Balance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPRINTER in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Balance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SPRINTER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPRINTER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - New Balance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Balance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SPRINTER

SPRINTER

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SPR13275224
New Balance

New Balance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SPRINTER company and New Balance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SPRINTER and New Balance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SPRINTER and New Balance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SPRINTER or New Balance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SPRINTER or New Balance ?
Between SPRINTER and New Balance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SPRINTER and New Balance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9