Comparison Overview

Sports Direct

VS

Magalu

Sports Direct

Unit A Brook Park, Shirebrook, undefined, NG20, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Founded in 1982, Sports Direct International plc is today the UK’s largest sporting goods retailer by revenue, and operates a diversified portfolio of sports, fitness, fashion and lifestyle fascias and brands. The Group’s strategy is to invest in our people and our key third party brand partners in order to elevate our retail proposition to attain new levels of excellence across our multi-brand, multi-channel offering to customers. We aspire to be a leading sports and lifestyle retailer internationally and to deliver sustainable growth for our shareholders in the medium to long term by offering our customers an unrivalled range of high quality leading brands. The Group provides a full multi-channel retail approach across its fascias in the UK, and increasingly across its fascias in continental Europe and elsewhere. The Group also wholesales and licenses its Group Brands to partners in the UK, continental Europe, the Americas, and the Far East.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 5,899
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Magalu

Rua Maria Prestes Maia 300, SAO PAULO, SP, BR, 02047-901
Last Update: 2025-11-27

O Magalu é o maior ecossistema para comprar e vender no Brasil, uma plataforma digital, com pontos físicos e calor humano. Desde maio de 2011, a companhia é listada no Novo Mercado da B3. Nos últimos anos, fez 14 aquisições, consolidando sua presença nacional. Além de 1.400 lojas em 27 estados do país, o Magalu conta com mais de dez marcas online como: Netshoes, Zattini, Shoestock, Estante Virtual, Época Cosméticos, Jovem Nerd, Kabum, CanalTech, Com School, Steal The Look - além de milhares de sellers em seu marketplace e um superaplicativo com uma base instalada de 21 milhões de usuários ativos. Atualmente, o Magalu emprega cerca de 40 000 funcionários. Sua política de gestão de pessoas foi reconhecida com diversos prêmios. Há mais de 20 anos está entre as melhores empresas para se trabalhar nos rankings da revista VocêS/A e do Great Place to Work Institute. Quer saber um pouco mais? Acesse a nossa página de carreiras: https://carreiras.magazineluiza.com.br/

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 42,316
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sports-direct-international.jpeg
Sports Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magazine-luiza.jpeg
Magalu
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sports Direct
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Magalu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sports Direct in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magalu in 2025.

Incident History — Sports Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sports Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Magalu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magalu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sports-direct-international.jpeg
Sports Direct
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched DNN platform vulnerabilities
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magazine-luiza.jpeg
Magalu
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sports Direct company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Magalu company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sports Direct company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Magalu company has not reported any.

In the current year, Magalu company and Sports Direct company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Magalu company nor Sports Direct company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sports Direct company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Magalu company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Magalu company nor Sports Direct company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sports Direct company nor Magalu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sports Direct company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Magalu company.

Magalu company employs more people globally than Sports Direct company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sports Direct nor Magalu holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H