Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SplendidSplendid
VS
Levi Strauss & Co.Levi Strauss & Co.
Splendid

Splendid

110 E. 9th Street, Los Angeles, 90079, US

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.splendid.com
763/1000Fair

Starting as the leading premium tee in the market 20 years ago, Splendid now has reach in almost every category—all of which highlight the soft and luxurious fabrics the brand is known for. With an uncomplicated, timeless aesthetic, Splendid has come to be so much more ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Levi Strauss & Co.

Levi Strauss & Co.

1155 Battery St, None, San Francisco, California, US, None

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.levistrauss.com
760/1000Fair

You’re an original. So are we. We’re a company of people who like to forge our own path. We invented the blue jean in 1873, and we reinvented khaki pants in 1986. We pioneered labor and environmental guidelines in manufacturing. And we work to build sustainability int...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:16,765
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Splendid

Splendid

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Levi Strauss & Co.

Levi Strauss & Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Splendid in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levi Strauss & Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Splendid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Splendid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Levi Strauss & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levi Strauss & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Splendid

Splendid

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Levi Strauss & Co.

Levi Strauss & Co.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEV007072625

FAQ

Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Splendid company and Levi Strauss & Co. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Splendid and Levi Strauss & Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Splendid and Levi Strauss & Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Splendid or Levi Strauss & Co. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Splendid or Levi Strauss & Co. ?
Between Splendid and Levi Strauss & Co., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Splendid and Levi Strauss & Co., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA