Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SPIT PASLODE BENELUXSPIT PASLODE BENELUX
VS
CarrierCarrier
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

't Hofveld 3, Groot-Bijgaarden, undefined, 1702, BE

Last Update: 19/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.spitpaslode.be
745/1000Moderate

Officiële SPIT-PASLODE LinkedIn pagina! Dé specialist in bevestigingsmaterialen. La page LinkedIn officielle de SPIT-PASLODE, le spécialiste par excellence du matériel de fixation. ITW is een Amerikaanse multinational met 48.000 werknemers en een omzet 14 miljard Doll...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Carrier

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, 33418, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.carrier.com
781/1000Fair

Carrier is a global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, pioneering sustainable innovations in climate technologies. Founded by Willis Carrier, the inventor of modern air conditioning, we have been shaping industries and enhancing lives for more than a ce...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:21,707
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Carrier

Carrier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPIT PASLODE BENELUX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Carrier

Carrier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Carrier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX or Carrier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX or Carrier ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Carrier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Carrier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA