Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SPIT PASLODE BENELUXSPIT PASLODE BENELUX
VS
Builders FirstSourceBuilders FirstSource
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

't Hofveld 3, Groot-Bijgaarden, undefined, 1702, BE

Last Update: 19/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.spitpaslode.be
745/1000Moderate

Officiële SPIT-PASLODE LinkedIn pagina! Dé specialist in bevestigingsmaterialen. La page LinkedIn officielle de SPIT-PASLODE, le spécialiste par excellence du matériel de fixation. ITW is een Amerikaanse multinational met 48.000 werknemers en een omzet 14 miljard Doll...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

6031 Connection Dr, Suite 400, Irving, TX, US, 75039

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bldr.com
725/1000Moderate

Builders FirstSource is the nation’s largest supplier of structural building products, value-added components and services to the professional market for new residential construction and repair and remodeling. Our focus is on providing unparalleled service to both large...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:11,723
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPIT PASLODE BENELUX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Builders FirstSource in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Builders FirstSource (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Builders FirstSource cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

SPIT PASLODE BENELUX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUI1774909946

FAQ

Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Builders FirstSource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Builders FirstSource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX or Builders FirstSource ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SPIT PASLODE BENELUX or Builders FirstSource ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Builders FirstSource, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SPIT PASLODE BENELUX and Builders FirstSource, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA