Comparison Overview
Spencer's Retail

Spencer's Retail
1st floor,Duncan House ,31, N.S.Road, , Kolkata, West Bengal, IN, 700001
Last Update: 18/02/2026
Spencer’s Retail Limited, part of RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, is a multi-format retailer providing a wide range of quality products across categories such as food, personal care, fashion, home essentials, electrical and electronics to its key consumers. Specialty sections s...

Reliance Digital
Reliance Digital, Navi Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 06/09/2026
Reliance Digital is a Consumer Electronics, Durables, IT & Telecom retail arm of Reliance Retail Group with more than 1300+ stores across India. Reliance Digital seeks to fulfill the dream of every Indian, be it through its nationwide network of conveniently located...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Spencer's Retail







Reliance Digital






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Spencer's Retail in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reliance Digital in 2026.
Incident History - Spencer's Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Spencer's Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Reliance Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reliance Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Spencer's Retail

Reliance Digital
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.