Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Speedscan AustraliaSpeedscan Australia
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Speedscan Australia

Speedscan Australia

4-6 Mentmore Ave, Rosebery, NSW, 2018, AU

Last Update: 17/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.speedscan.com.au
751/1000Fair

Speedscan brings together a combination of experience, leading edge technologies and robust processing services to deliver world class outsourcing solutions for document intensive business processes. These Document Process Outsourcing (DPO) solutions are delivered fr...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 27/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://aws.amazon.com
584/1000Very Poor

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
19
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Speedscan Australia

Speedscan Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Speedscan Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 1692.45% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Speedscan Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Speedscan Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Speedscan Australia

Speedscan Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1782541446
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HEAAMA1782153018
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOAMA1781166643

FAQ

Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Speedscan Australia company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Speedscan Australia and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Speedscan Australia and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Speedscan Australia or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Speedscan Australia or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between Speedscan Australia and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Speedscan Australia and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2