Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-TrostbergKreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg
VS
RevolutRevolut
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spk-ts.de
755/1000Fair

Unsere Sparkasse wurde im Jahre 1863 gegründet und ist das größte selbstständige Kredit­institut im Land­kreis. Unser Geschäfts­gebiet ist, mit Ausnahme der Gemeinde Schnaitsee, der gesamte Landkreis Traunstein mit rund 170.000 Einwohnern und einer Fläche von 1.534 qkm....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Revolut

Revolut

30 S Colonnade, London, E14 5HX, GB

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.revolut.com
637/1000Poor

People deserve more from their money. More visibility, more control, and more freedom. Since 2015, Revolut has been on a mission to deliver just that. Our powerhouse of products help our 70+ million customers get more from their money every day. As we continue our ligh...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:19,786
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Revolut

Revolut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Revolut has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Revolut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Revolut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Revolut

Revolut

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REV1785327822
🔒 Incident : Breach
REV1785335106
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
N26REV1776860884

FAQ

Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg company and Revolut company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Revolut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Revolut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg or Revolut ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg or Revolut ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Revolut, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kreissparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg and Revolut, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9