Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar NordSparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord
VS
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

D1 1-3, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 68159

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord is a bankwesen company based out of D1 1-3, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:225
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Kav 54-55, Jakarta, Special capital Region of Jakarta, ID, 12190

Last Update: 23/07/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

Bank Mandiri was established on 2 October 1998, as part of the bank restructuring program of the Government of Indonesia. In July 1999, four state-owned banks - Bank Bumi Daya, Bank Dagang Negara, Bank Exim and Bapindo - were amalgamated into Bank Mandiri. The history o...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:46,325
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord company and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord or PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord or PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Rhein Neckar Nord and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1