Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse RegensburgSparkasse Regensburg
VS
SMBC GroupSMBC Group
Sparkasse Regensburg

Sparkasse Regensburg

Lilienthalstraße 5, Regensburg, 93049, DE

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Wir machen es den Menschen einfach, ihr Leben besser zu gestalten. Auch als Arbeitgeber. Als Marktführer ist das Herzstück unserer Unternehmensphilosophie unsere Kundennähe und die Regionalität. Unsere Beschäftigten beraten mit Leidenschaft unseren Kundenkreis in d...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:197
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SMBC Group

SMBC Group

1丁目 1-2, Marunouchi Chiyoda-Ku,, Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
832/1000Good

SMBC Group is a top-tier global financial group. Headquartered in Tokyo and with a 400-year history, SMBC Group offers a diverse range of financial services, including banking, leasing, securities, credit cards, and consumer finance. The Group has more than 150 offices ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,322
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Regensburg

Sparkasse Regensburg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SMBC Group

SMBC Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Regensburg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMBC Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Regensburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Regensburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SMBC Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMBC Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Regensburg

Sparkasse Regensburg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SMBC Group

SMBC Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg company and SMBC Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg and SMBC Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg and SMBC Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Regensburg or SMBC Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Regensburg or SMBC Group ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg and SMBC Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Regensburg and SMBC Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1