Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse Neumarkt-ParsbergSparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg
VS
MCB Bank LimitedMCB Bank Limited
Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

N/A

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Mit einem flächendeckenden Filialnetz und insgesamt nahezu 400 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern ist die Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg einer der größten Arbeitgeber in der Region. Als ertragsstarkes Kreditinstitut gehören wir nachhaltig zu den erfolgreichsten Sparkassen i...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:85
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MCB Bank Limited

MCB Bank Limited

15 Main Gulberg, MCB House, Lahore, PK, -

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mcb.com.pk
759/1000Fair

Welcome to the Official LinkedIn page of MCB Bank Limited. Established in 1947, MCB Bank Limited is one of the largest Banks in Pakistan with a total customer base exceeding 7 million. We have products and services to suit the every need of customers. To learn more abou...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:15,252
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MCB Bank Limited

MCB Bank Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCB Bank Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MCB Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCB Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MCB Bank Limited

MCB Bank Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg company and MCB Bank Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg and MCB Bank Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg and MCB Bank Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg or MCB Bank Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg or MCB Bank Limited ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg and MCB Bank Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Neumarkt-Parsberg and MCB Bank Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3