Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel HunsrückSparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück
VS
Wells FargoWells Fargo
Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

Cusanusstraße, Bernkastel, 54470, DE

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Weiter Informationen finden Sie unter www.sparkasse-emh.de. Sie finden uns auch auf Facebook und Instagram (@sparkasseemh). Abonnieren Sie unsere Kanäle und bleiben Sie immer auf dem neuesten Stand unserer Aktivitäten.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:96
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

420 Montgomery St, San Francisco, California, US, 94103

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wellsfargo.com
801/1000Good

Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is a diversified, community-based financial services company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo’s vision is to satisfy our customers’ financial needs and help them succeed financially. Founded in 1852 and headquarte...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:221,512
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Fargo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wells Fargo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Fargo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITWELNAVUSAFID1771266975
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEL033091825
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEL539072925

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück company and Wells Fargo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück and Wells Fargo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück and Wells Fargo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück or Wells Fargo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück or Wells Fargo ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück and Wells Fargo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Mittelmosel - Eifel Mosel Hunsrück and Wells Fargo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1