Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse Langen-SeligenstadtSparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt
VS
Franklin TempletonFranklin Templeton
Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

Frankfurter Straße 137, Seligenstadt, 63500, DE

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.sls-direkt.de
755/1000Fair

Mit unseren rund 600 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern sowie einer Bilanzsumme von rund 5 Milliarden Euro engagieren wir uns für die Menschen und Unternehmen im Kreis Offenbach. Als lokal verankertes Kreditinstitut zeigen wir uns verantwortlich für das Gemeinwohl und u...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:182
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Franklin Templeton

Franklin Templeton

1 Franklin Pkwy, San Mateo, 94403, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Franklin Resources, Inc. [NYSE:BEN] is a global investment management organization with subsidiaries operating as Franklin Templeton (www.franklinresources.com). The products, services, information and materials referenced in this site may not be available to resident...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,033
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Franklin Templeton

Franklin Templeton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin Templeton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Franklin Templeton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin Templeton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Franklin Templeton

Franklin Templeton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt company and Franklin Templeton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt and Franklin Templeton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt and Franklin Templeton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt or Franklin Templeton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt or Franklin Templeton ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt and Franklin Templeton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Langen-Seligenstadt and Franklin Templeton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2