Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse HochsauerlandSparkasse Hochsauerland
VS
Standard CharteredStandard Chartered
Sparkasse Hochsauerland

Sparkasse Hochsauerland

Am Markt 4, Brilon, 59929, DE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Wir sind eine leistungsstarke und vertriebsorientierte Sparkasse im östlichen Hochsauerland mit einer Bilanzsumme von rund 1,5 Mrd. Euro. Nähe und Kompetenz zählen in 8 Filialen zu unseren zentralen Erfolgsfaktoren. Als regional verankertes Kreditinstitut sind wir ein b...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

1 Basinghall Avenue, London, EC2V 5DD, GB

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.sc.com
804/1000Good

We are a leading international banking group, with a presence in 54 of the world’s most dynamic markets. Our purpose is to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity, and our heritage and values are expressed in our brand promise, here for good. If you...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:78,279
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Hochsauerland

Sparkasse Hochsauerland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Hochsauerland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standard Chartered in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Hochsauerland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Hochsauerland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Standard Chartered (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standard Chartered cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Hochsauerland

Sparkasse Hochsauerland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA173851123

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland company and Standard Chartered company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland and Standard Chartered, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland and Standard Chartered, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Hochsauerland or Standard Chartered ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Hochsauerland or Standard Chartered ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland and Standard Chartered, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Hochsauerland and Standard Chartered, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1