Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse ForchheimSparkasse Forchheim
VS
alinmaalinma
Sparkasse Forchheim

Sparkasse Forchheim

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Mehr als nur ein Job. Kommen Sie zu Deutschlands größtem Finanzdienstleister. Die Sparkasse Forchheim hat als Arbeitgeber einiges zu bieten – ein Job, der Spaß macht, der kommunikativ und nah an den Menschen in der Region ist. Entdecken Sie neue Perspektiven, Ausbildun...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
alinma

alinma

King Fahad Road - Alanoud Northern Tower, PO Box 66674, Riyadh, SA, 11586

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alinma.com/
785/1000Fair

Alinma Bank is a Saudi joint stock company formed in accordance with Royal Decree No. M/15 dated 28/2/1427H (28/3/2006) and Ministerial Resolution No. 42 dated 27/2/1427H (27/3/2006). The share capital of Alinma Bank is SAR 20 billion consisting of 1.5 billion shares wi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:12,838
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Forchheim

Sparkasse Forchheim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
alinma

alinma

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Forchheim in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for alinma in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Forchheim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Forchheim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - alinma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

alinma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Forchheim

Sparkasse Forchheim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
alinma

alinma

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim company and alinma company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim and alinma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim and alinma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Forchheim or alinma ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Forchheim or alinma ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim and alinma, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Forchheim and alinma, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1