Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse FürstenfeldbruckSparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck
VS
Banco do BrasilBanco do Brasil
Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

Hauptstraße 8, Fürstenfeldbruck, 82256, DE

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Die Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck ist Marktführer in der Region und zählt zu den großen Sparkassen Bayerns. Über 600 Mitarbeiter schätzen das Wohnen, Arbeiten und die kurzen Wege in einem der attraktivsten Wirtschaftsräume Deutschlands. Die direkte Nähe zur Landeshauptstad...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:149
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Banco do Brasil

Banco do Brasil

BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bb.com.br
800/1000Good

Eu experimentei um novo jeito de me comunicar com você. Você usa o mundo digital para criar um universo totalmente seu e nesse novo universo eu acompanho você. Eu sei… Você é muito mais que digital. Eu olho para você e me vejo. Este é um dos motivos de eu estar aqui p...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:71,064
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Banco do Brasil

Banco do Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco do Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Banco do Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco do Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Banco do Brasil

Banco do Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck company and Banco do Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck and Banco do Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck and Banco do Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck or Banco do Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck or Banco do Brasil ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck and Banco do Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Fürstenfeldbruck and Banco do Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA