Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse BodenseeSparkasse Bodensee
VS
DBS BankDBS Bank
Sparkasse Bodensee

Sparkasse Bodensee

Charlottenstraße 2, Friedrichshafen, 88045, DE

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Hier entsteht Gutes. Wir sind kein fancy FinTech. Dafür sind wir hier – für euch vor Ort in der Bodensee-Region. Vom ersten Konto über die Finanzierung der eigenen vier Wände bis zur richtigen Altersvorsorge. Hier machen wir uns stark für alles, was wirklich zählt. Im L...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:174
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DBS Bank

DBS Bank

12 Marina Boulevard, DBS Asia Central @ Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3, Singapore, SG, 018982

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
708/1000Moderate

DBS is a leading financial services group in Asia with a presence in 19 markets. Headquartered and listed in Singapore, DBS is in the three key Asian axes of growth: Greater China, Southeast Asia and South Asia. The bank's "AA-" and "Aa1" credit ratings are among the hi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:33,756
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Bodensee

Sparkasse Bodensee

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DBS Bank

DBS Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Bodensee in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DBS Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Bodensee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Bodensee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DBS Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DBS Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Bodensee

Sparkasse Bodensee

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DBS Bank

DBS Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DOMDBS1770325487
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DBS540081825

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee company and DBS Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee and DBS Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee and DBS Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Bodensee or DBS Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Bodensee or DBS Bank ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee and DBS Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Bodensee and DBS Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA