Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse Arnsberg-SundernSparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern
VS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

Haupstraße 10-12, Arnsberg, 59755, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Wir sind Sparkasse - ein Team, das Ziele gemeinsam erreicht! Die Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern ist einer der größten Finanzdienstleister in unserer Region. Seit der Gründung im Jahre 1837 ist unser Handeln geprägt von einer starken Identifikation mit den Städten und den M...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Gustav Mahlerlaan 10, Amsterdam, 1082PP, NL

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.abnamro.nl
809/1000Good

Welkom op het LinkedIn-account van ABN AMRO. We staan 24/7 klaar om jouw vragen te beantwoorden. Onze taak is altijd om de klant te ondersteunen op het moment dat het er echt op aankomt. Dat is onze verantwoordelijkheid. Dat maakt ons relevant. En wat er vandaag de dag...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:25,483
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABN AMRO Bank N.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern or ABN AMRO Bank N.V. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern or ABN AMRO Bank N.V. ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse Arnsberg-Sundern and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3