Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sparkasse am NiederrheinSparkasse am Niederrhein
VS
RBCRBC
Sparkasse am Niederrhein

Sparkasse am Niederrhein

Ostring 47441, Moers, Nordrhein-Westfalen, DE, 47441

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Die Sparkasse am Niederrhein ist eine öffentlich-rechtliche Sparkasse mit Sitz in Moers. Ihr Geschäftsgebiet umfasst die Städte Moers, Neukirchen-Vluyn, Rheinberg und Xanten sowie die Gemeinden Alpen und Sonsbeck. Damit ist sie zugleich das größte Kreditinstitut im Krei...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:79
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RBC

RBC

200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2J5

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rbc.com
814/1000Good

Royal Bank of Canada is a global financial institution with a purpose-driven, principles-led approach to delivering leading performance. Our success comes from the 94,000+ employees who leverage their imaginations and insights to bring our vision, values and strategy to...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:96,279
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sparkasse am Niederrhein

Sparkasse am Niederrhein

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RBC

RBC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse am Niederrhein in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sparkasse am Niederrhein (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse am Niederrhein cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sparkasse am Niederrhein

Sparkasse am Niederrhein

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RBC

RBC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RBC3032130100425

FAQ

Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein company and RBC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein and RBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein and RBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sparkasse am Niederrhein or RBC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sparkasse am Niederrhein or RBC ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein and RBC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sparkasse am Niederrhein and RBC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1