ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Space Norway is Northern Europe’s leading satellite communications services provider and a key player in the European space industry. We provide secure and reliable satellite connectivity services to governments, public and defence sectors, commercial maritime, land-based industries, and broadcasters. Our portfolio of satellites, teleport infrastructure and sub-marine cables enables us to deliver intelligent solutions that meet the needs of clients in Europe, the Arctic, the Middle East and North Africa. Our team’s industry-leading expertise, agility and commitment to excellence allow us to respond swiftly to market demands, accelerating technological breakthroughs. Our mission is to harness space for security, research, commercial growth, and beyond. We remain at the forefront of innovation - enhancing life and expanding possibilities. The Group is owned by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and represents the Norwegian Government’s strategic interests in the sector. Our subsidiaries include Space Norway Satcom AS (formerly, Telenor Satellite AS), Space Norway Heosat AS, Statsat AS and Kongsberg Satellite Services AS (KSAT). Space Norway. Space for More.

Space Norway A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Space Norway

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

space-norway

Employees number:

114

Number of followers:

8,676

NAICS:

5174

Industry Type:

Satellite Telecommunications

Homepage:

spacenorway.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

SPA_3377786

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSpace Norway Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/space-norway.jpeg
Space Norway Satellite Telecommunications
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreSpace Norway Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/space-norway.jpeg
Space Norway Satellite Telecommunications
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Space Norway Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Space Norway (operator of the Svalbard Undersea Cable System)Cyber Attack10061/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of geographical region

Description: In January 2022, Space Norway’s **Svalbard Undersea Cable System**—the world’s northernmost subsea fiber-optic cables connecting mainland Norway to the Svalbard archipelago—suffered deliberate sabotage. The damage occurred in a deep-sea section (980ft to 9,000ft depth) where cables are typically buried six feet below the seabed, yet were severed by suspected **Russian hybrid warfare tactics**. Norwegian police confirmed 'human impact' as the cause, while open-source investigations revealed **Russian trawlers made over a dozen passes** over the cable route before the outage. Though redundant systems prevented service disruption for Svalbard’s users (including critical Arctic research stations and satellite ground stations), the attack demonstrated **vulnerabilities in NATO’s northern infrastructure**. The incident aligned with broader Russian strategies to **test allied responses**, disrupt communications, and exploit undersea infrastructure as a **geopolitical pressure point**. No perpetrators were prosecuted due to lack of direct evidence, but the pattern mirrored other **Baltic Sea cable sabotage** linked to Russia’s shadow fleet, reinforcing concerns over **critical infrastructure resilience** in the High North.

Space Norway (operator of the Svalbard Undersea Cable System)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 1/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of geographical region

Description: In January 2022, Space Norway’s **Svalbard Undersea Cable System**—the world’s northernmost subsea fiber-optic cables connecting mainland Norway to the Svalbard archipelago—suffered deliberate sabotage. The damage occurred in a deep-sea section (980ft to 9,000ft depth) where cables are typically buried six feet below the seabed, yet were severed by suspected **Russian hybrid warfare tactics**. Norwegian police confirmed 'human impact' as the cause, while open-source investigations revealed **Russian trawlers made over a dozen passes** over the cable route before the outage. Though redundant systems prevented service disruption for Svalbard’s users (including critical Arctic research stations and satellite ground stations), the attack demonstrated **vulnerabilities in NATO’s northern infrastructure**. The incident aligned with broader Russian strategies to **test allied responses**, disrupt communications, and exploit undersea infrastructure as a **geopolitical pressure point**. No perpetrators were prosecuted due to lack of direct evidence, but the pattern mirrored other **Baltic Sea cable sabotage** linked to Russia’s shadow fleet, reinforcing concerns over **critical infrastructure resilience** in the High North.

Ailogo

Space Norway Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Space Norway

Incidents vs Satellite Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Space Norway in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Space Norway in 2025.

Incident Types Space Norway vs Satellite Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Space Norway in 2025.

Incident History — Space Norway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Space Norway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Space Norway Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Space Norway is Northern Europe’s leading satellite communications services provider and a key player in the European space industry. We provide secure and reliable satellite connectivity services to governments, public and defence sectors, commercial maritime, land-based industries, and broadcasters. Our portfolio of satellites, teleport infrastructure and sub-marine cables enables us to deliver intelligent solutions that meet the needs of clients in Europe, the Arctic, the Middle East and North Africa. Our team’s industry-leading expertise, agility and commitment to excellence allow us to respond swiftly to market demands, accelerating technological breakthroughs. Our mission is to harness space for security, research, commercial growth, and beyond. We remain at the forefront of innovation - enhancing life and expanding possibilities. The Group is owned by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and represents the Norwegian Government’s strategic interests in the sector. Our subsidiaries include Space Norway Satcom AS (formerly, Telenor Satellite AS), Space Norway Heosat AS, Statsat AS and Kongsberg Satellite Services AS (KSAT). Space Norway. Space for More.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Space Norway Similar Companies

Deutsche Telekom

Welcome to Deutsche Telekom. As one of the world's most valuable brands, we design innovative solutions and products in the areas of connectivity, networks, digitalization and security. #connectingyourworld At Deutsche Telekom, we believe that each and every one of us has the power to move society

Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (NASDAQ U.S.: TIGO, Nasdaq) is a leading provider of fixed and mobile telecommunications services in Latin America. Through our TIGO® and Tigo Business® brands, we provide a wide range of digital services and products, including TIGO Money for mobile financial services, TIGO Sports for loca

We are a forward-focused digital champion always been focused on innovation and evolution. Our purpose is to create and bring greater dimension and richness to people’s personal and professional lives.  With stc, You will always be empowered to focus on delivering what’s next through collaborati

We are driving the digital transition of Italy and Brazil with innovative technologies and services because we want to contribute to accelerating the sustainable growth of the economy and society by bringing value and prosperity to people, companies and institutions. We offer diversified solutions

Vodafone

At Vodafone, we believe that connectivity is a force for good. If we use it for the things that really matter, it can improve people's lives and the world around us. Through our technology we empower people, connecting everyone regardless of who they are or where they live, we protect the planet a

Telcel

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra s

newsone

Space Norway CyberSecurity News

November 21, 2025 02:28 PM
Cybersecurity in the Space Domain: Why It’s Time to Stop Leaving the Front Door Unlocked

For decades, satellite communications systems operated under a comforting illusion: that their physical distance from terrestrial networks...

October 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Researcher: "There's a growing rivalry in space right now"

A British general says their satellites are being disrupted by other actors. A Norwegian researcher says we will see more of this in the...

September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Space Norway signs new launch agreement with SpaceX

Space Norway has signed a contract with SpaceX for the launch of the new communications satellite, THOR 8, into geostationary orbit.

September 11, 2025 07:00 AM
Space Norway and Allente Sign Long-Term Satellite Agreement

Space Norway, a leading provider of satellite services across Europe, and Allente, a major player in the Nordic pay-TV market.

September 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Space Norway and Telenor extend partnership to provide linear OTT and IPTV services to Pay-TV markets in Norway, Sweden, and Finland

Space Norway and Telenor Nordics have announced a new agreement focused on delivering IPTV and linear OTT streaming services to the pay-TV...

July 30, 2025 07:00 AM
NATO’s approach to space

Space is essential to the Alliance's deterrence and defence, underpinning its ability to navigate and track forces, to maintain robust...

July 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Norway Accuses Sweden Over Spaceport Safety as Europe’s Rocket Race Escalates

Norway warns of dangers from Swedish rocket launches as the two nations clash over Europe's space ambitions and satellite plans.

July 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Ofcom consults on Inmarsat, Space Norway’s earth station application

The two are preparing to connect the Arctic with non-geostationary orbiting (NGSO) satellite payloads, GX10A and 10B – UK regulator mulls...

June 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Space Norway is authorised Starlink reseller

Space Norway, Northern Europe's leading satellite operator, is pleased to announce that it has signed an agreement with Starlink by SpaceX.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Space Norway CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Space Norway

The official website of Space Norway is http://www.spacenorway.com.

Space Norway’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 749, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Space Norway’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Space Norway have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Space Norway have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Space Norway comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Space Norway have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Space Norway comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Space Norway is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Space Norway have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Space Norway is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Space Norway

Space Norway operates primarily in the Satellite Telecommunications industry.

Number of Employees at Space Norway

Space Norway employs approximately 114 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Space Norway

Space Norway presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Space Norway’s LinkedIn Followers

Space Norway’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 8,676 followers.

NAICS Classification of Space Norway

Space Norway is classified under the NAICS code 5174, which corresponds to Satellite Telecommunications.

Space Norway’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Space Norway does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Space Norway’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Space Norway maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/space-norway.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Space Norway

As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Space Norway has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Space Norway has an estimated 34 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Space Norway ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

How does Space Norway detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with nato operation baltic sentry (2024), incident response plan activated with finnish national bureau of investigation (estlink 2 case), incident response plan activated with norwegian police (svalbard cable investigation), and third party assistance with marinetraffic (ship tracking data), third party assistance with open-source intelligence (osint) for trawler movements, and and containment measures with detention of *eagle s* vessel (later released), containment measures with increased maritime patrols (nato assets), and remediation measures with cable repairs (status unspecified), remediation measures with nato-industry collaboration for infrastructure resilience, and recovery measures with swedish military exercises (counter-sabotage drills), recovery measures with enhanced surveillance of undersea cables, and communication strategy with public statements by nato secretary general mark rutte, communication strategy with media interviews with lithuanian fm gabrielius landsbergis, communication strategy with cbs news investigative reports, and enhanced monitoring with nato naval drones and aircraft patrols, enhanced monitoring with national surveillance assets (unspecified)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage

Title: Alleged Russian Sabotage of Undersea Cables in the Baltic Sea (2022–2024)

Description: A series of suspected sabotage incidents targeting undersea fiber optic cables in the Baltic Sea, allegedly linked to Russian hybrid warfare tactics. The cables, critical for global internet traffic, financial transactions, and military communications, were damaged in multiple instances, including drag marks from anchors and loitering vessels. Finland, Estonia, Norway (Svalbard), and other Baltic NATO members reported disruptions, with Russia denying involvement. The incidents are part of broader hybrid warfare tactics, including cyberattacks, infrastructure sabotage, and espionage, aimed at testing NATO resolve and intimidating regional populations. NATO launched 'Baltic Sentry' in 2024 to counter these threats.

Date Detected: 2022-01-07

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2022-02-00

Type: Physical Sabotage

Attack Vector: Anchor Dragging (Ships/Trawlers)Underwater Sabotage (Unconfirmed Explosives)Loitering Near Cable RoutesPlausible Deniability via 'Shadow Fleet' Vessels

Vulnerability Exploited: Shallow Depth of Baltic Sea (Ease of Anchor Damage)Unburied or Lightly Buried Cables in Steep TerrainLack of Real-Time Monitoring for Undersea InfrastructureGeopolitical Tensions (NATO Expansion, Ukraine War)

Threat Actor: Primary: Russian State-Affiliated Actors (Alleged)Secondary: ["Russian 'Shadow Fleet' Vessels (e.g., *Eagle S*)", 'Russian Fishing Trawlers (Svalbard Incident)', 'Ukrainian Citizens Linked to Russian Intelligence (Poland Rail Sabotage)']Denial: Russia denies all allegations, labeling them 'Russophobia'

Motivation: Intimidation of Baltic States and NATO AlliesTesting NATO Unity and Response CapabilitiesDisruption of Critical Infrastructure as Hybrid Warfare TacticRetaliation for Western Support of UkrainePotential Prelude to Larger Military Escalation

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Anchor Drag Marks (Physical Damage)Vessel Loitering Near Cable Routes (Reconnaissance).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Systems Affected: Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia Power/Telecom Cable)Svalbard Undersea Cable System (Norway)Unspecified Telecom Cables in Gulf of Finland

Downtime: [{'system': 'Estlink 2', 'duration': 'Partial outage (Christmas 2024)', 'restoration': 'Unknown'}, {'system': 'Svalbard Cable', 'duration': 'Jan 7, 2022 (Redundant cable prevented service loss)', 'restoration': 'Investigation closed (no evidence)'}]

Operational Impact: Reduced Interconnectivity Between Finland and EstoniaIncreased NATO Maritime Patrols (Operation Baltic Sentry)Swedish Military Exercises for Counter-Sabotage

Brand Reputation Impact: Erosion of Trust in Undersea Infrastructure ResiliencePerception of NATO Vulnerability to Hybrid Threats

Legal Liabilities: Finnish Criminal Charges Against *Eagle S* Crew (Dismissed on Appeal)

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Entity Name: Finland

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Critical Infrastructure (Energy/Telecom)

Location: Baltic Sea (Gulf of Finland)

Size: National

Customers Affected: Partial outage for Finland-Estonia connectivity

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Entity Name: Estonia

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Critical Infrastructure (Energy/Telecom)

Location: Baltic Sea (Gulf of Finland)

Size: National

Customers Affected: Partial outage for Finland-Estonia connectivity

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Entity Name: Norway (Space Norway)

Entity Type: State-Owned Enterprise

Industry: Telecommunications

Location: Greenland Sea (Svalbard Cable)

Size: National

Customers Affected: No service loss (redundant cable)

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Entity Name: NATO

Entity Type: Military Alliance

Industry: Defense/Critical Infrastructure Protection

Location: Baltic Sea Region

Size: Multinational

Customers Affected: Increased operational burden (Baltic Sentry)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Incident Response Plan Activated: ['NATO Operation Baltic Sentry (2024)', 'Finnish National Bureau of Investigation (Estlink 2 Case)', 'Norwegian Police (Svalbard Cable Investigation)']

Third Party Assistance: Marinetraffic (Ship Tracking Data), Open-Source Intelligence (Osint) For Trawler Movements.

Containment Measures: Detention of *Eagle S* Vessel (Later Released)Increased Maritime Patrols (NATO Assets)

Remediation Measures: Cable Repairs (Status Unspecified)NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Resilience

Recovery Measures: Swedish Military Exercises (Counter-Sabotage Drills)Enhanced Surveillance of Undersea Cables

Communication Strategy: Public Statements by NATO Secretary General Mark RutteMedia Interviews with Lithuanian FM Gabrielius LandsbergisCBS News Investigative Reports

Enhanced Monitoring: NATO Naval Drones and Aircraft PatrolsNational Surveillance Assets (Unspecified)

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as NATO Operation Baltic Sentry (2024), Finnish National Bureau of Investigation (Estlink 2 Case), Norwegian Police (Svalbard Cable Investigation), .

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through MarineTraffic (Ship Tracking Data), Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) for Trawler Movements, .

Data Breach Information

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Cable Repairs (Status Unspecified), NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Resilience, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by detention of *eagle s* vessel (later released), increased maritime patrols (nato assets) and .

Ransomware Information

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Swedish Military Exercises (Counter-Sabotage Drills), Enhanced Surveillance of Undersea Cables, .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Legal Actions: Finnish Criminal Case Against *Eagle S* Crew (Dismissed),

Regulatory Notifications: NATO Coordination Under Article 5 (Potential Future Trigger)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Finnish Criminal Case Against *Eagle S* Crew (Dismissed), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Lessons Learned: Undersea Cables Are Vulnerable to Physical Sabotage in Shallow Waters, Hybrid Warfare Blurs Lines Between Cyber, Physical, and Psychological Attacks, Plausible Deniability via 'Shadow Fleet' Complicates Attribution, NATO Unity Is Critical to Deterring Further Escalation, Redundant Infrastructure Mitigates Operational Impact (e.g., Svalbard Cables)

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Recommendations: Increase Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea, Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage IncidentsIncrease Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea, Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage IncidentsIncrease Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea, Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage IncidentsIncrease Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea, Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage IncidentsIncrease Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea, Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage Incidents

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Undersea Cables Are Vulnerable to Physical Sabotage in Shallow Waters,Hybrid Warfare Blurs Lines Between Cyber, Physical, and Psychological Attacks,Plausible Deniability via 'Shadow Fleet' Complicates Attribution,NATO Unity Is Critical to Deterring Further Escalation,Redundant Infrastructure Mitigates Operational Impact (e.g., Svalbard Cables).

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Source: CBS News

URL: https://www.cbsnews.com

Date Accessed: 2024-11-00

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Source: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)

URL: https://rusi.org

Date Accessed: 2024-11-00

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Source: Finnish National Bureau of Investigation

URL: https://poliisi.fi

Date Accessed: 2024-10-00

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Source: Space Norway (Svalbard Cable Operator)

URL: https://spacenorway.no

Date Accessed: 2022-01-00

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Source: NATO Press Release (Operation Baltic Sentry)

URL: https://www.nato.int

Date Accessed: 2024-01-00

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: CBS NewsUrl: https://www.cbsnews.comDate Accessed: 2024-11-00, and Source: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)Url: https://rusi.orgDate Accessed: 2024-11-00, and Source: Finnish National Bureau of InvestigationUrl: https://poliisi.fiDate Accessed: 2024-10-00, and Source: Space Norway (Svalbard Cable Operator)Url: https://spacenorway.noDate Accessed: 2022-01-00, and Source: NATO Press Release (Operation Baltic Sentry)Url: https://www.nato.intDate Accessed: 2024-01-00.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Investigation Status: [{'case': 'Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia)', 'status': 'Criminal Charges Dismissed (Prosecutors Appealing)'}, {'case': 'Svalbard Cable (Norway)', 'status': 'Closed (Lack of Evidence)'}, {'case': 'Polish Rail Sabotage', 'status': 'Ongoing (Suspects Identified)'}]

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Statements By Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte, Media Interviews With Lithuanian Fm Gabrielius Landsbergis and Cbs News Investigative Reports.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Stakeholder Advisories: Nato Members Urged To Enhance Critical Infrastructure Protection, Baltic States Advised To Diversify Connectivity Routes, Energy And Telecom Sectors Warned Of Hybrid Threats.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Nato Members Urged To Enhance Critical Infrastructure Protection, Baltic States Advised To Diversify Connectivity Routes and Energy And Telecom Sectors Warned Of Hybrid Threats.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Entry Point: Anchor Drag Marks (Physical Damage), Vessel Loitering Near Cable Routes (Reconnaissance),

Reconnaissance Period: ['Svalbard Incident: >12 Trawler Passes Before Damage', 'Eagle S: Departed Ust-Luga on Day of Outage']

High Value Targets: Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia Interconnect), Svalbard Cable (Northernmost Subsea System), Baltic Nato Members' Limited Redundancy,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia Interconnect), Svalbard Cable (Northernmost Subsea System), Baltic Nato Members' Limited Redundancy,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Sabotage SPA0002100112125

Root Causes: Geopolitical Tensions (Russia-Nato, Ukraine War), Physical Vulnerability Of Undersea Cables In Shallow Waters, Lack Of Unified Deterrence Against Hybrid Tactics, Plausible Deniability Via Non-State Proxy Vessels,

Corrective Actions: Nato Operation Baltic Sentry (Maritime Patrols), Finnish Appeal Of Dismissed Charges Against *Eagle S* Crew, Swedish Counter-Sabotage Military Exercises, Proposed Nato Article 5 Clarifications For Hybrid Attacks,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Marinetraffic (Ship Tracking Data), Open-Source Intelligence (Osint) For Trawler Movements, , Nato Naval Drones And Aircraft Patrols, National Surveillance Assets (Unspecified), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Nato Operation Baltic Sentry (Maritime Patrols), Finnish Appeal Of Dismissed Charges Against *Eagle S* Crew, Swedish Counter-Sabotage Military Exercises, Proposed Nato Article 5 Clarifications For Hybrid Attacks, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Primary: Russian State-Affiliated Actors (Alleged)Secondary: ["Russian 'Shadow Fleet' Vessels (e.g., *Eagle S*)", 'Russian Fishing Trawlers (Svalbard Incident)', 'Ukrainian Citizens Linked to Russian Intelligence (Poland Rail Sabotage)']Denial: Russia denies all allegations and labeling them 'Russophobia'.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2022-01-07.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2022-02-00.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia Power/Telecom Cable)Svalbard Undersea Cable System (Norway)Unspecified Telecom Cables in Gulf of Finland.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was marinetraffic (ship tracking data), open-source intelligence (osint) for trawler movements, .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Detention of *Eagle S* Vessel (Later Released)Increased Maritime Patrols (NATO Assets).

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Finnish Criminal Case Against *Eagle S* Crew (Dismissed), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Redundant Infrastructure Mitigates Operational Impact (e.g., Svalbard Cables).

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Increase Real-Time Monitoring of Undersea Cables with AI/ML Anomaly Detection, Deepen NATO-Industry Collaboration for Infrastructure Hardening, Clarify Thresholds for Invoking Article 5 in Hybrid Warfare Scenarios, Expand Maritime Domain Awareness in the Baltic Sea and Develop Rapid-Response Protocols for Cable Sabotage Incidents.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Finnish National Bureau of Investigation, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), NATO Press Release (Operation Baltic Sentry), CBS News and Space Norway (Svalbard Cable Operator).

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.cbsnews.com, https://rusi.org, https://poliisi.fi, https://spacenorway.no, https://www.nato.int .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is [{'case': 'Estlink 2 (Finland-Estonia)', 'status': 'Criminal Charges Dismissed (Prosecutors Appealing)'}, {'case': 'Svalbard Cable (Norway)', 'status': 'Closed (Lack of Evidence)'}, {'case': 'Polish Rail Sabotage', 'status': 'Ongoing (Suspects Identified)'}].

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was NATO Members Urged to Enhance Critical Infrastructure Protection, Baltic States Advised to Diversify Connectivity Routes, Energy and Telecom Sectors Warned of Hybrid Threats, .

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Svalbard Incident: >12 Trawler Passes Before DamageEagle S: Departed Ust-Luga on Day of Outage.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=space-norway' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge