Comparison Overview

SPA, inc.

VS

Baldwins Intellectual Property

SPA, inc.

21225, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The objective of SPA, LLC is to provide research analysis and consultative services in the areas of safety, human factors engineering, and risk management to private industry, insurance and legal communities, government, and trade organizations. These services include, but are not limited to, analysis of facilities, products, operations, and equipment; programs to detect programmatic, physical or environmental hazards/failures, coupled with recommendations of needed solutions/methods to mitigate or eliminate hazardous and/or high-risk conditions and/or lower insurance and worker compensation costs; and seminar development and production. In addition, our technical consultations have been utilized by the insurance and legal communities for expert testimony, pretrial, and trial preparation in cases involving construction accidents, industrial accidents, maritime and transportation accidents, slips, trips and falls, and product warning and safety issues. As a professional organization, SPA, LLC recognizes the need to objectively analyze each assignment individually and is bound by a code of ethical standards which includes competence, credibility, and confidentiality. A sampling of the SPA inc. client list and references will be made available on request. iStanley D. Pulz, MA, CSP, P.E.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baldwins Intellectual Property

Level 36, ANZ Centre, Auckland Central, 1010, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27

On 16 October 2020, AJ Park acquired Baldwins. The Baldwins team has joined AJ Park and now operates as one firm under the AJ Park brand. To keep up with all things IP and the Baldwins team, follow the AJ Park LinkedIn page. Please note the Baldwins LinkedIn page is no longer active.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SPA, inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baldwins-intellectual-property.jpeg
Baldwins Intellectual Property
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SPA, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baldwins Intellectual Property
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPA, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baldwins Intellectual Property in 2025.

Incident History — SPA, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPA, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baldwins Intellectual Property (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baldwins Intellectual Property cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SPA, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baldwins-intellectual-property.jpeg
Baldwins Intellectual Property
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SPA, inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Baldwins Intellectual Property company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Baldwins Intellectual Property company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SPA, inc. company.

In the current year, Baldwins Intellectual Property company and SPA, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baldwins Intellectual Property company nor SPA, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baldwins Intellectual Property company nor SPA, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baldwins Intellectual Property company nor SPA, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SPA, inc. company nor Baldwins Intellectual Property company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Baldwins Intellectual Property company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SPA, inc. company.

Baldwins Intellectual Property company employs more people globally than SPA, inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SPA, inc. nor Baldwins Intellectual Property holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X