Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

South Washington County SchoolsSouth Washington County Schools
VS
Orange County Public SchoolsOrange County Public Schools
South Washington County Schools

South Washington County Schools

7362 E. Point Douglas Rd. S., Cottage Grove, 55016, US

Last Update: 06/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.sowashco.org
647/1000Poor

South Washington County Schools (SoWashCo Schools) is a premiere school district located east of St. Paul, encompassing all or parts of Cottage Grove, Newport, St. Paul Park, Woodbury, and Afton, Denmark and Grey Cloud Island Townships. More than 18,400 students attend ...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:1,301
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

445 W. Amelia St., Orlando, 32801, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ocps.net
791/1000Fair

Orange County Public Schools is recognized as one of the top urban school districts in the nation – the 8th largest school district in America (4th in Florida) with 210 traditional schools, approximately 206,000 students and over 24,000 employees. OCPS students enjoy...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:18,502
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
South Washington County Schools

South Washington County Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

South Washington County Schools has 34.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - South Washington County Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Washington County Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orange County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
South Washington County Schools

South Washington County Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LEHALASOW1775500819
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
SOU112181122
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SOU2267622
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between South Washington County Schools company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between South Washington County Schools and Orange County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between South Washington County Schools and Orange County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - South Washington County Schools or Orange County Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - South Washington County Schools or Orange County Public Schools ?
Between South Washington County Schools and Orange County Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between South Washington County Schools and Orange County Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2