Comparison Overview
Southfields Veterinary Specialists

Southfields Veterinary Specialists
No 1 Bramston Way, Laindon, Essex, SS15 6TP, GB
Last Update: 03/06/2026
Southfields Veterinary Specialists (formerly VRCC) provides outstanding Specialist veterinary care. We accept referrals in Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Neurology, Feline Medicine and Cardiology, as well as offering the most advanced cancer treatment availa...

VCA Animal Hospitals
VCA Animal Hospitals, 12401 West Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, US, 90064
Last Update: 01/04/2026
A leader in veterinary care, VCA Animal Hospitals is committed to taking care of the future of veterinary medicine. We are a family of hometown animal hospitals determined to positively impact pets, people and our communities. From general practice to emergency and spec...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Southfields Veterinary Specialists







VCA Animal Hospitals






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Veterinary Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Southfields Veterinary Specialists in 2026.
Incidents vs Veterinary Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VCA Animal Hospitals in 2026.
Incident History - Southfields Veterinary Specialists (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Southfields Veterinary Specialists cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VCA Animal Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VCA Animal Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Southfields Veterinary Specialists

VCA Animal Hospitals
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.