Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Southern LincSouthern Linc
VS
TelkomselTelkomsel
Southern Linc

Southern Linc

5555 Glenridge Connector, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA, US, 30342

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.southernlinc.com
756/1000Fair

Southern Linc is an Atlanta, Georgia based integrated digital wireless service provider that began serving commercial customers in February 1996. Southern Linc was developed by its parent company, Southern Company (NYSE: SO), to meet the wireless communications needs of...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:551
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

Telkomsel Smart Office - Kompleks Telkom Landmark Tower, Jakarta Selatan, 12710, ID

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telkomsel.com
775/1000Fair

Connecting Nation. Accelerating Indonesia's Future. As Indonesia's leading digital telecommunications company, Telkomsel is committed to building a connected, competitive, and future-ready society. For over 29 years, we've empowered individuals, homes, and businesses w...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,661
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Southern Linc

Southern Linc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Linc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telkomsel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Southern Linc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Linc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telkomsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telkomsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Southern Linc

Southern Linc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEL212216123

FAQ

Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Southern Linc company and Telkomsel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Southern Linc and Telkomsel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Southern Linc and Telkomsel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Southern Linc or Telkomsel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Southern Linc or Telkomsel ?
Between Southern Linc and Telkomsel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Southern Linc and Telkomsel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA