Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Southern California HospitalsSouthern California Hospitals
VS
Johnson & Johnson MedTechJohnson & Johnson MedTech
Southern California Hospitals

Southern California Hospitals

3828 Delmas Terrace, None, Culver City , California , US, 90232

Last Update: 27/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sch-culvercity.com
763/1000Fair

Southern California Hospitals are located in some of the hottest destinations, including Hollywood, Culver City and Van Nuys. With a combined bed capacity of over 570 beds, the three-hospital system represents the fourth-largest combined facility in the greater Los Ange...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:402
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare soluti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,750
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Southern California Hospitals

Southern California Hospitals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern California Hospitals in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Southern California Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern California Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Southern California Hospitals

Southern California Hospitals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Southern California Hospitals company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Southern California Hospitals and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Southern California Hospitals and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Southern California Hospitals or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Southern California Hospitals or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Between Southern California Hospitals and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Southern California Hospitals and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8