Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

South Gloucestershire CouncilSouth Gloucestershire Council
VS
Workingfor.beWorkingfor.be
South Gloucestershire Council

South Gloucestershire Council

South Gloucestershire Council offices, Yate, BS37 5AF, GB

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.southglos.gov.uk
691/1000Weak

South Gloucestershire has a rich natural and cultural heritage. It is a mixed urban and rural authority of great diversity located in the South West of England which covers 53,665 hectares. It is an area of diversity and contrast with a variety of communities, characte...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.workingfor.be
782/1000Fair

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choos...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
South Gloucestershire Council

South Gloucestershire Council

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Gloucestershire Council in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - South Gloucestershire Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Gloucestershire Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
South Gloucestershire Council

South Gloucestershire Council

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SOU5733057110425
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - South Gloucestershire Council or Workingfor.be ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - South Gloucestershire Council or Workingfor.be ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council and Workingfor.be, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between South Gloucestershire Council and Workingfor.be, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-14683
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. Affected by this issue is the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromCompressedByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. The manipulation of the argument lengthOfCompressedContents results in uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-14660
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Job Portal 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file login.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtUser/txtPass results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-14659
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /patientappointment.php. Such manipulation of the argument patiente leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14658
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php. The manipulation of the argument smarksrange[] results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14657
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php of the component Database Query Handler. This manipulation of the argument squestions[] causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8