Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Source for BusinessSource for Business
VS
E.ONE.ON
Source for Business

Source for Business

Rydon Lane, Exeter, EX2 7HR, GB

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.source4b.co.uk
736/1000Moderate

We’re a leading water and wastewater retailer supporting over 150,000 business customer accounts across the UK. As the trading brand of Pennon Water Services Ltd—a Joint Venture between Pennon Group Plc and South Staffordshire Plc—we bring over 25 years of expertise in ...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:16
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
E.ON

E.ON

Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, DE, 45131

Last Update: 06/08/2026

View Profile
816/1000Good

We are one of Europe's largest energy companies with the business areas of energy networks, energy infrastructure solutions and energy sales. It’s on us to make new energy work, and we are actively leading energy’s future – putting our customers first and delivering inn...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:30,538
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Source for Business

Source for Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
E.ON

E.ON

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Source for Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Source for Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Source for Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Source for Business

Source for Business

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SOU1764346310
E.ON

E.ON

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Source for Business company and E.ON company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Source for Business and E.ON, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Source for Business and E.ON, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Source for Business or E.ON ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Source for Business or E.ON ?
Between Source for Business and E.ON, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Source for Business and E.ON, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9